Bureaucratic Politics in Bangladesh: Analyzing the Generalist-Specialist Divide and Pathways for Reform

Authors

  • Anika Tabassum University of Rajshahi
  • Asmaull Husna Mim University of Rajshahi
  • Sultan Mahmud University of Rajshahi
  • Yeasir Arafat University of Rajshahi
  • Fairuj Sadaf Opee University of Rajshahi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijaamr.v3i8.102

Keywords:

Bureaucratic Politics, Generalist Bureaucrats, Specialist Bureaucrats, Civil Service System, Politicization of Bureaucracy

Abstract

Bangladesh's bureaucratic framework remains central to the functioning of its administration and governance system. A growing area of concern within this structure is the ongoing debate between generalist and specialist bureaucrats, especially regarding their roles in policy efficiency, autonomy, and development outcomes. Generalists, largely recruited through the Bangladesh Civil Service (BCS), are often praised for their broad administrative capabilities and mobility across sectors. Nonetheless, there is growing criticism that their dominance frequently overshadows specialists — including professionals such as engineers, doctors, and economists — who possess sector-specific expertise crucial for informed policymaking. This research explores both the historical background and the current state of this divide, analyzing the ways institutional arrangements, politicization, and career advancement practices deepen the divide between generalists and specialists in the civil service. By incorporating international perspectives and focusing on the local context, the study highlights the need to rethink bureaucratic roles in light of increasingly complex governance demands, such as technological advancement, climate change adaptation, and innovation in public service delivery. The paper concludes with recommendations to foster a more equitable and competence-based bureaucracy that balances administrative skills with specialized knowledge

References

Aberbach, J. D., Putnam, R. D., & Rockman, B. A. (1981). Bureaucrats and politicians in Western democracies. Harvard University Press.

Ahmed, M. (2024, December 24). Conflict among cadres on the rise in government service. Prothom Alo. https://en.prothomalo.com/bangladesh/government/i4adxvny92

Allison, G. T., & Halperin, M. H. (1972). Bureaucratic politics: A paradigm and some policy implications. World Politics, 24, 40–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010559

Arafat, M. Y. (2024, January). Research ethics: Meaning and principles. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4887943

Arafat, M. Y., & Fahmida. (2025a). History, agendas, and anomalies of Bangladesh politics. DIROSAT: Journal of Education, Social Sciences & Humanities, 3(2), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.58355/dirosat.v3i2.158

Arafat, M. Y., & Fahmida. (2025b). Envisioning accountability through a mobile application: A theoretical framework. Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies, 5(2), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.35912/jgas.v5i2.2706

Arafat, M. Y., Alam, M. M., Raz, N. H., Opee, M. F. S., Tabassum, N., & Fahmida. (2025). Exploring the determinants and barriers of national integrity in the context of Bangladesh. INTERDISIPLIN: Journal of Qualitative and Quantitative Research, 2(4), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.61166/interdisiplin.v2i4.121

Arora, R. K., & Goyal, R. (2022, December 19). Indian public administration: Institutions and issues (4th ed.). New Age International.

Barua, S., Shahan, A. M., & Hassan, M. M. (2025). The evolution of regional representativeness in the administrative cadre service of Bangladesh. Social Science Review, 41(1), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.3329/ssr.v41i1.79135

Dhaka Tribune. (2025, January 7). Bangladesh bureaucracy faces fresh friction amid reforms. Dhaka Tribune. https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/370136/bangladesh-bureaucracy-faces-fresh-friction-amid

Dimock, M. E., & Dimock, G. O. (1964). Public administration (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Grindle, M. S. (1997). Getting good government: Capacity building in the public sectors of developing countries. Harvard Institute for International Development.

Jahan, F. (2006). Public administration in Bangladesh (Working Paper Series No. 1). Centre for Governance Studies, BRAC University. http://hdl.handle.net/10361/343

Jamil, I. (2002). Administrative culture in Bangladesh: Tensions between tradition and modernity. International Review of Sociology, 12(1), 93–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906700220135363

Jamil, I. (2020). How culture may nurture institutional trust: Insights from Bangladesh and Nepal. Development Policy Review, 39(3), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12520

Khan, B. (2024, May 16). Major admin reforms shelved for 27 years. The Daily Star. Retrieved from https://www.thedailystar.net/news/bangladesh/news/major-admin-reforms-shelved-27-years-3611001

Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through.” Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677

March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Wiley.

Obaidullah, A. T. M. (1996). Generalist–specialist conflict in public service in Bangladesh: An overview. Bangladesh Journal of Public Administration, 5(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.36609/bjpa.v5i1.157

Rashid, A. K. (2014). The role of the bureaucracy in policymaking in Bangladesh. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 36(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2014.911491

Sarker, A. E. (2004). Administrative reform in Bangladesh: Three decades of failure. International Public Management Journal, 7(3), 365–384.

Zafarullah, H. (2007). Bureaucratic elitism in Bangladesh: The predominance of generalist administrators. Asian Journal of Political Science, 15(2), 161–173. https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/3906

Zafarullah, H. (2013). Bureaucratic culture and the social-political connection: The Bangladesh example. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(13), 932–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.773033

Downloads

Published

2025-09-23

Issue

Section

Articles