From Al-Haqq and Al-Batil to Digital Misinformation: Qur'anic Epistemic Ethics, Verification, and the Struggle for Truth in the Platform Age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijaamr.v4i9.315Keywords:
Al-Haqq, Al-Batil, Qur'anic Ethics, Misinformation, Disinformation, Epistemic Responsibility, Tabayyun, Digital Communication, Media Literacy, TruthAbstract
Digital misinformation is often treated as a technical problem of false content, yet its persistence also raises a normative question: what responsibilities govern the reception, evaluation, transmission, and correction of information? This qualitative literature review develops a Qur'anic Epistemic Responsibility Framework (QERF) by placing the Qur'anic contrast between al-haqq (truth) and al-batil (falsehood) in dialogue with contemporary research on misinformation, cognitive bias, social identity, verification, correction, media literacy, and platform governance. The review uses the initiating source material on the clash between truth and falsehood as a conceptual starting point, while grounding empirical claims in peer-reviewed scholarship published primarily from 2020 to 2026. The synthesis identifies six linked duties: receiving information without equating exposure with truth; pausing before impulsive transmission; verifying source, evidence, and context; evaluating distinctions among fact, inference, opinion, and uncertainty; communicating proportionately to evidential confidence; and correcting errors when discovered. The article argues that Qur'anic ethics and misinformation science are complementary but not interchangeable: the former supplies a normative account of responsible communication, whereas the latter identifies empirically observed vulnerabilities and tested interventions. The resulting framework connects individual cognition with interpersonal norms, professional communication, platform architecture, and public institutions, offering a basis for digital literacy, journalism, religious communication, education, and public policy in Indonesia and beyond.
References
Allen, J., Howland, B., Mobius, M., Rothschild, D., & Watts, D. J. (2020). Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem. Science Advances, 6(14), eaay3539. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay3539
Anderau, G. (2023). Fake news and epistemic flooding. Synthese, 202, 106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04336-7
Badrinathan, S. (2021). Educative interventions to combat misinformation: evidence from a field experiment in India. American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1325-1341. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000459
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2021). Correction experiences on social media during COVID-19. Social Media + Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211008829
Capewell, G., Maertens, R., Remshard, M., van der Linden, S., Compton, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Roozenbeek, J. (2024). Misinformation interventions decay rapidly without an immediate posttest. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 54, 441-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.13049
de Ruiter, A. (2021). The distinct wrong of deepfakes. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 1311-1332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00459-2
Diakopoulos, N., & Johnson, D. (2021). Anticipating and addressing the ethical implications of deepfakes in the context of elections. New Media & Society, 23(7), 2072-2098. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820925811
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2023). What are conspiracy theories? A definitional approach to their correlates, consequences, and communication. Annual Review of Psychology, 74, 271-298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031329
Ecker, U. K. H., & Antonio, L. M. (2021). Can you believe it? An investigation into the impact of retraction source credibility on the continued influence effect. Memory & Cognition, 49(4), 631-644. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01129-y
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E. K., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022). The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1, 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y
Enders, A. M., Uscinski, J. E., Seelig, M. I., Klofstad, C. A., Wuchty, S., Funchion, J. R., Murthi, M. N., Premaratne, K., & Stoler, J. (2023). The relationship between social media use and beliefs in conspiracy theories and misinformation. Political Behavior, 45(2), 781-804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09734-6
Fallis, D. (2021). The epistemic threat of deepfakes. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 623-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00419-2
Fathurrohman, R., Anna, D. N., Sibawaihi, & Fahmi, M. Z. (2024). Framing religious hoaxes: logical, religious, and legal perspectives in Indonesia. Religious: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama dan Lintas Budaya, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.15575/rjsalb.v8i2.15545
Fauziyah, U. (2020). Tabayyun dan hukumnya sebagai penanggulangan berita hoax di era digital dalam perspektif fiqih. Al Yasini: Jurnal Keislaman, Sosial, Hukum dan Pendidikan, 5(1), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.55102/alyasini.v5i1.3775
Ford, T., Yankoski, M., Facciani, M., & Weninger, T. (2023). Online media literacy intervention in Indonesia reduces misinformation sharing intention. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 15(2), 99-123. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2023-15-2-8
Guess, A. M., Lerner, M., Lyons, B., Montgomery, J. M., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., & Sircar, N. (2020). A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(27), 15536-15545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920498117
Hameleers, M. (2022). Separating truth from lies: comparing the effects of news media literacy interventions and fact-checkers in response to political misinformation in the US and Netherlands. Information, Communication & Society, 25(1), 110-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1764603
Hameleers, M., & van der Meer, T. G. L. A. (2024). Striking the balance between fake and real: under what conditions can media literacy messages that warn about misinformation maintain trust in accurate information?. Behaviour & Information Technology, 43, 1209-1221. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2267700
Harris, K. R. (2022). Real fakes: the epistemology of online misinformation. Philosophy & Technology, 35, 83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00581-9
Hashmi, U. M., Rashid, R. A., & Ahmad, M. K. (2021). The representation of Islam within social media: a systematic review. Information, Communication & Society, 24(13), 1962-1981. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1847165
Hoes, E., Aitken, B., Zhang, J., Gackowski, T., & Wojcieszak, M. (2024). Prominent misinformation interventions reduce misperceptions but increase scepticism. Nature Human Behaviour, 8, 1545-1553. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01884-x
Hoes, E., Clemm, B., Gessler, T., Qian, S., & Wojcieszak, M. (2025). (Media attention to) misinformation can undermine trust in scientists. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-025-10090-y
Hornsey, M. J., Bierwiaczonek, K., Sassenberg, K., & Douglas, K. M. (2023). Individual, intergroup and nation-level influences on belief in conspiracy theories. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2, 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00133-0
Huang, G., Jia, W., & Yu, W. (2024). Media literacy interventions improve resilience to misinformation: a meta-analytic investigation of overall effect and moderating factors. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241288103
Huang, K., & Krafft, P. M. (2024). Performing platform governance: Facebook and the stage management of data relations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 30, 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-024-00473-5
Jenuri, Suwarma, D. M., Parhan, M., Sartika, A., Ramdani, A. D., & Rahmah, F. A. (2021). Islamic communication ethics towards hoax phenomenon on social media. Dialogia, 19(2), 515-534. https://doi.org/10.21154/dialogia.v19i2.3446
Jones-Jang, S. M., Mortensen, T., & Liu, J. (2021). Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies do not. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869406
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Cook, J., van der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., & Oreskes, N. (2023). Misinformation and the epistemic integrity of democracy. Current Opinion in Psychology, 54, 101711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101711
Li, J., & Chang, X. (2022). Combating misinformation by sharing the truth: a study on the spread of fact-checks on social media. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10296-z
Loomba, S., de Figueiredo, A., Piatek, S. J., de Graaf, K., & Larson, H. J. (2021). Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 337-348. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1
Lu, C., Hu, B., Bao, M.-M., Wang, C., Bi, C., & Ju, X.-D. (2024). Can media literacy intervention improve fake news credibility assessment? A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 27(4), 240-252. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2023.0324
Maertens, R., Götz, F. M., Golino, H. F., Roozenbeek, J., Schneider, C. R., Kyrychenko, Y., Kerr, J. R., Stieger, S., McClanahan, W. P., Drabot, K., He, J., & van der Linden, S. (2024). The Misinformation Susceptibility Test (MIST): a psychometrically validated measure of news veracity discernment. Behavior Research Methods, 56(3), 1863-1899. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02124-2
Mansoor, H. M. H. (2024). Media and information literacy as a model of societal balance: a grounded meta-synthesis. Heliyon, 10(3), e25380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25380
Mosleh, M., Pennycook, G., Arechar, A. A., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Cognitive reflection correlates with behavior on Twitter. Nature Communications, 12, 921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20043-0
Osmundsen, M., Bor, A., Vahlstrup, P. B., Bechmann, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2021). Partisan polarization is the primary psychological motivation behind political fake news sharing on Twitter. American Political Science Review, 115(3), 999-1015. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000290
Parhan, M., Jenuri, & Islamy, M. R. F. (2021). Media sosial dan fenomena hoax: tinjauan Islam dalam etika berkomunikasi. Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 5(1), 59-80. https://doi.org/10.15575/cjik.v5i1.12887
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
Pennycook, G., Epstein, Z., Mosleh, M., Arechar, A. A., Eckles, D., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 592, 590-595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2
Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychological Science, 31(7), 770-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939054
Porter, E., & Wood, T. J. (2021). The global effectiveness of fact-checking: evidence from simultaneous experiments in Argentina, Nigeria, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(37), e2104235118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2104235118
Rathje, S., Roozenbeek, J., Van Bavel, J. J., & van der Linden, S. (2023). Accuracy and social motivations shape judgements of (mis)information. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 892-903. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01540-w
Roozenbeek, J., Schneider, C. R., Dryhurst, S., Kerr, J., Freeman, A. L. J., Recchia, G., van der Bles, A. M., & van der Linden, S. (2020). Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. Royal Society Open Science, 7, 201199. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201199
Roozenbeek, J., Traberg, C. S., & van der Linden, S. (2022b). Technique-based inoculation against real-world misinformation. Royal Society Open Science, 9(5), 211719. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211719
Roozenbeek, J., van der Linden, S., Goldberg, B., Rathje, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2022a). Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media. Science Advances, 8(34), eabo6254. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo6254
Sun, Y., & Xie, J. (2024). Who shares misinformation on social media? A meta-analysis of individual traits related to misinformation sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 158, 108271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108271
Thomas, P., Hogan-Taylor, C., Yankoski, M., & Weninger, T. (2022). Pilot study suggests online media literacy programming reduces belief in false news in Indonesia. First Monday, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v27i1.11683
Thomson, T. J., Angus, D., Dootson, P., Hurcombe, E., & Smith, A. (2022). Visual mis/disinformation in journalism and public communications: current verification practices, challenges, and future opportunities. Journalism Practice, 16(5), 938-962. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1832139
Triana, H. W., Oktavianus, Ilham, M., & Khairunnisa, A. (2023). Religious narratives during the pandemic: transitivity analysis of Covid-19 hoax discourse on Indonesian social media. Jurnal Arbitrer, 10(1), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.10.1.66-75.2023
Uscinski, J. E., Enders, A. M., Klofstad, C., Seelig, M., Drochon, H., Premaratne, K., & Murthi, M. (2022). Have beliefs in conspiracy theories increased over time?. PLOS ONE, 17(7), e0270429. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270429
Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020). Deepfakes and disinformation: exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news. Social Media + Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408
van der Linden, S. (2022). Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public. Nature Medicine, 28, 460-467. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6
van der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., Maertens, R., Basol, M., Kacha, O., Rathje, S., & Traberg, C. S. (2021). How can psychological science help counter the spread of fake news?. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 24, e25. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2021.23
van der Meer, T. G. L. A., Hameleers, M., & Ohme, J. (2023). Can fighting misinformation have a negative spillover effect? How warnings for the threat of misinformation can decrease general news credibility. Journalism Studies, 24(6), 803-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2187652
Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2020). Defining misinformation and understanding its bounded nature: using expertise and evidence for describing misinformation. Political Communication, 37(1), 136-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1716500
Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2021). Addressing COVID-19 misinformation on social media preemptively and responsively. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 27(2), 396-403. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2702.203139
Vraga, E. K., Bode, L., & Tully, M. (2022). Creating news literacy messages to enhance expert corrections of misinformation on Twitter. Communication Research, 49(2), 245-267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219898094
Walter, N., & Tukachinsky, R. (2020). A meta-analytic examination of the continued influence of misinformation in the face of correction: how powerful is it, why does it happen, and how to stop it?. Communication Research, 47(2), 155-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219854600
Walter, N., Cohen, J., Holbert, R. L., & Morag, Y. (2020). Fact-checking: a meta-analysis of what works and for whom. Political Communication, 37(3), 350-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894
Warnke, L., Maier, A.-L., & Gilbert, D. U. (2024). Social media platforms’ responses to COVID-19-related mis- and disinformation: the insufficiency of self-governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 28, 1079-1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-023-09694-5
Xiao, X. (2022). Not doomed: examining the path from misinformation exposure to verification and correction in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Telematics and Informatics, 74, 101890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101890
Zhang, Y., Guo, B., Ding, Y., Liu, J., Qiu, C., Liu, S., & Yu, Z. (2022). Investigation of the determinants for misinformation correction effectiveness on social media during COVID-19 pandemic. Information Processing & Management, 59(3), 102935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102935
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Loso Judijanto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





