Mechanisms for Formulating Public Policies Under Democratic Systems a Case Study of Iraq after 2003

Mohammed Basem Hamza

doi:10.59890/ijaamr.v3i4.6

Authors

Mohammed Basem Hamza Al-Qasim green university

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijaamr.v3i4.6

Keywords:

Public Policy, Official Institution, Unofficial Institution, Democratic System

Abstract

The study examines the process of rebuilding Iraq's political landscape after the ousting of Saddam Hussein in 2003. It examines the role of various political actors, including new political parties, ethnic groups, and international stakeholders, in shaping policy directions. The research emphasizes the importance of institutional frameworks like the Iraqi Constitution and parliamentary procedures in policy formulation. The study also examines the challenges of navigating sectarian divisions that threatened democratic processes and the impact of external influences, particularly from the United States and neighboring countries, on Iraq's domestic policy-making. The study also highlights the need to build robust institutions for democratic governance and the importance of civil society engagement in enhancing transparency and accountability. The study uses a detailed case study approach to analyze policy initiatives in areas like security, economic development, and social services, offering valuable lessons for other nations transitioning to democracy. The findings emphasize the need to balance external support with domestic autonomy, build resilient institutions, and foster a participatory political culture for effective public policy formulation in post-conflict setting

References

A Witt, J. (1981). Industrial democracy in West Germany: Co-determination and participation.

Abdou, A. M. (2021). Good governance and COVID‐19: The digital bureaucracy to response the pandemic (Singapore as a model). Journal of Public Affairs

Abeje, A. (2013). PARTY SYSTEM INSTITUTIONALIZATION AND THE PROSPECT OF DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN ETHIOPIA. Cela, S. & Cinar, B. (2015). Political Party and Party System Institutionalization in Albania.

Agus Windu, B. (2019). Peran Aktif Masyarakat Dan Sistem Politik Yang Demokratis Dapat Memperkuat Kebijakan Publik Yang Mampu Menjaga Persatuan Dan Kesatuan.

Ansell, C. & Torfing, J. (2021). Public governance as co-creation: A strategy for revitalizing the public sector and rejuvenating democracy.

Bedock, C. & Pilet, J. B. (2021). Who supports citizens selected by lot to be the main policymakers? A study of French citizens. Government and Opposition.

Bolleyer, N. & Salát, O. (2021). Parliaments in times of crisis: COVID-19, populism and executive dominance. West European Politics.

Caputo, F., Magliocca, P., Canestrino, R., & Rescigno, E. (2023). Rethinking the role of technology for citizens' engagement and sustainable development in smart cities. Sustainability

Daniel, Kaufmann., Aart, Karry., and Pablo, Z. Lobaton. Governance matters, (Development Research Group Macroeconomics and Growth: the World Bank): 1999

Dunlop, C. A. & Radaelli, C. M. (2019). Technocracy and the Policy Process.

Ferdous,J. A., (2009). Public policy making in substance of politics. London:Oxford University Press

Greenwood, J. & Halpin, D. (2007). The European Commission and the public governance of interest groups in the European Union: seeking a niche between accreditation and laissez-faire

Head, B. W. (2022). Wicked problems in public policy: Understanding and responding to complex challenges.

Henry, N. (2015). Public administration and public affairs. Routledge.

Hill, M. & Hupe, P. (2021). Implementing public policy: An introduction to the study of operational governance.

Howlett, M. (2023). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments.

J. Henisz, W. & A. Zelner, B. (2003). Legitimacy, Interest Group Pressures and Change in Emergent Institutions: The Case of Foreign Investors and Host Country Governments

James Anderson (2007) Public Policy Making, translated into Arabic by Dr. Amer Al-Kubaisi, 3rd ed., Dar Al-Masirah for Publishing, Distribution and Printing, Amman, 2007.

Kaim, M. (2021). Rethinking modes of political participation: The conventional, unconventional, and alternative. Democratic Theory.

Kamel Barbar (2006) Public Administration in Lebanon: Challenges and Reform, Dar Al Manhal, Beirut, Lebanon.

Lipman, P. (2023). Beyond accountability: Toward schools that create new people for a new way of life. The critical pedagogy reader.

Nielsen, K. S., Nicholas, K. A., Creutzig, F., Dietz, T., & Stern, P. C. (2021). The role of high-socioeconomic-status people in locking in or rapidly reducing energy-driven greenhouse gas emissions. Nature Energy

Payan, D. D., Brown, P., & Song, A. V. (2021). County‐Level Recreational Marijuana Policies and Local Policy Changes in Colorado and Washington State (2012‐2019). The Milbank Quarterly.

Peter,A. J. (2010). Policy making and evaluation,Journal of Arts,Vol 2

Raven, J., (Peter) Achterberg, P. H. J., (Romke) van der Veen, R. J., & (Mara) Yerkes, M. A. (2011). An institutional embeddedness of welfare opinions? The link between public opinion and social policy in the Netherlands (1970-2004).

Rosenbloom, D. H., Kravchuk, R. S., & Clerkin, R. M. (2022). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector.

Schleicher, D. (2015). Things Arenu27t Going That Well Over There Either: Party Polarization and Election Law in Comparative Perspectiv

USAID, “Iraq’s first Bureau for public policy opens in Baghdad,” 2003, accessed July 2016 https://www.usaid.gov/results-data/success

V Raju, K. & Ravindra, A. (2016). Promoting Policy Formulation at the State Level in India

Von Soest, C. (2023). Why do we speak to experts? Reviving the strength of the expert interview method. Perspectives on Politics.

Willis, R., Curato, N., & Smith, G. (2022). Deliberative democracy and the climate crisis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 13(2), e759.