Effectiveness of Custom Typography on Brand Recall among Culinary MSMEs in the Era of Digital Marketing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijasr.v4i6.240Keywords:
Custom Typography, Brand Recall, Culinary Msmes, Digital Marketing, Visual Brand Identity, IndonesiaAbstract
Culinary micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) increasingly compete through social media, marketplace listings, and short-form visual content. In such environments, typography is not only a decorative element but also a visual brand asset that can support memory, differentiation, and consumer recognition. This study examines the effectiveness of custom typography on brand recall among culinary MSMEs in the era of digital marketing. The manuscript uses Indonesian market statistics from BPS, KADIN Indonesia, and DataReportal, then demonstrates the research model with an illustrative online experiment involving 120 respondents. Participants were assigned to view a culinary MSME social media advertisement using either custom typography or generic template typography. Brand recall score, unaided recall, aided recognition, perceived distinctiveness, attention, and purchase intention were measured. Results from the illustrative dataset indicate that custom typography produced a higher mean recall score (M = 7.40, SD = 1.29) than generic typography (M = 5.84, SD = 1.05), t(approx.) = 7.23, p < 0.001, d = 1.32. Unaided brand recall was also higher under the custom typography condition (46.7%) than the generic typography condition (11.7%). Regression analysis suggests that the custom typography condition remains positively associated with recall after controlling for attention and primary platform use. The findings support the argument that distinctive, consistent, and context-appropriate typography can strengthen brand memory for culinary MSMEs operating in crowded digital channels.
References
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik Penyediaan Makanan dan Minuman 2023. Retrieved from
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Statistik Penyediaan Makanan Minuman 2024. Retrieved from
DataReportal. (2025). Digital 2026: Indonesia. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2026-indonesia
Doyle, J. R., & Bottomley, P. A. (2004). Font appropriateness and brand choice. Journal of Business Research, 57(8), 873–880. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00487-3
Doyle, J. R., & Bottomley, P. A. (2006). Dressed for the occasion: Font-product congruity in the perception of logotype. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1602_2
Henderson, P. W., Giese, J. L., & Cote, J. A. (2004). Impression management using typeface design. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 60–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.60.42736
KADIN Indonesia. (2026). UMKM Indonesia. Retrieved from https://kadin.id/data-dan-statistik/umkm-indonesia/
Purnomo, S. (2024). Digital transformation of MSMEs in Indonesia: A systematic literature review. Journal of Management and Digital. Retrieved from https://journal.nurscienceinstitute.id/index.php/jmdb/article/view/1121
Ward, E., Trinh, G., Beal, V., Dawes, J., & Romaniuk, J. (2025). Standing out while fitting in: An objective measure of visual branding cohesion across a product portfolio. International Journal of Market Research, 67(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853241291443
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rima Risnowati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





