Strengthening Inter-Agency Integration of SPBE Governance in Ambon City

Jusuf Madubun; Muhtar; Judy de Fretes; Wirasti Rahayaan; Honoratus Ruban

doi:10.59890/ijasr.v4i7.262

Authors

Jusuf Madubun Universitas Pattimura
Muhtar Universitas Pattimura
Judy de Fretes Universitas Pattimura
Wirasti Rahayaan Universitas Pattimura
Honoratus Ruban Universitas Pattimura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijasr.v4i7.262

Keywords:

SPBE, Smart City, Data Integration, Interoperability, Ambon City

Abstract

This article explains the strengthening of inter-agency Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE) governance toward integrated business processes, data, services, information security, and performance accountability. Using a qualitative case-study synthesis in Ambon City by reinterpreting Smart City research findings as an empirical baseline. SPBE is positioned as the institutional development of smart city initiatives, shifting digital innovation from sectoral applications of documents, interviews, observations, and focus group discussions, the study shows that e-signatures, IETPD 96%, QRIS, Command Center 112, OMI Channel, digital libraries, One Data, waste banks, and Sound of Green provide initial integration assets. However, data interoperability, cross-agency standards, digital human-resource capacity, and technical regulation must be strengthened.

References

Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppa, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017). What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities, 60, 234-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002

Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2020). The emerging data-driven smart city and its innovative applied solutions for sustainability. Energy Informatics, 3(1), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-020-00108-7

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Caragliu, A., del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117

Cavallini, S., Soldi, R., Friedl, J., & Volpe, M. (2016). Using the quadruple helix approach to accelerate the transfer of research and innovation results to regional growth. European Union.

Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T. A., & Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2289-2297. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.615

Dawes, S. S. (2009). Governance in the digital age: A research and action framework for an uncertain future. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.003

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead: Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467-494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Estevez, E., & Janowski, T. (2013). Electronic governance for sustainable development: Conceptual framework and state of research. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S94-S109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.001

Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2020). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge.

Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press.

Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001

Harrison, C., Eckman, B., Hamilton, R., Hartswick, P., Kalagnanam, J., Paraszczak, J., & Williams, P. (2010). Foundations for smarter cities. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 54(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1147/JRD.2010.2048257

Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001

Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Menteri PANRB Nomor 59 Tahun 2020 tentang pemantauan dan evaluasi Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik.

Khatri, V., & Brown, C. V. (2010). Designing data governance. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 148-152. https://doi.org/10.1145/1629175.1629210

Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2014). Digital government transformation and Internet portals: The co-evolution of technology, organizations, and institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 545-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.08.001

Meijer, A., & Bolivar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference, 282-291. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602

OECD. (2020). The OECD digital government policy framework: Six dimensions of a digital government. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2a-en

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 39 Tahun 2019 tentang Satu Data Indonesia.

Scholta, H., Mertens, W., Kowalkiewicz, M., & Becker, J. (2019). From one-stop shop to no-stop shop: An e-government stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.010

Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of e-government: A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001

United Nations. (2022). E-government survey 2022: The future of digital government. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., & Foth, M. (2022). Towards smart sustainable cities: Integrating digital technology into urban planning and management. Journal of Urban Technology, 29(1), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2021.1894639

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.